Every figure this model derived for ATCH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
16,706,153
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
46,920,585
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
30,820,905
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
22,258,579
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
5,837,223
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-03-31
ocf
-3,123,018
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
16,272,464
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
2,525,363
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ATCH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-33.67
current ratio
1.52
current ratio reported
1.52
fcf margin
-19.19
interest cover
-1.37
operating margin
-49.29
owner earnings margin
-34.71
revenue growth
50.33
revenue growth per share
50.33
roic
-33.02
rule of 40
1.04
sbc pct revenue
15.52
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ATCH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-07 (115 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left