Every figure this model derived for ANTA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
380,113
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
7,850,170
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
874,193,106
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
753,650,784
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
119,680,242
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
-3,838,110
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
79,678,739
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
4,766,783
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ANTA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
26.08
current ratio
1.16
current ratio reported
1.16
dilution pct
27.56
ebit yoy
372.03
ev ebit
6.57
ev owner earnings
-10.98
ev sales
1.24
fcf margin
-5.29
net debt ebitda
0.5
operating margin
18.85
owner earnings margin
-11.28
revenue growth
67.9
revenue growth per share
31.63
roic
9.29
rule of 40
86.75
sbc pct revenue
5.98
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ANTA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
no interest expense tagged while 16M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect