Every figure this model derived for AMTD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
746,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
51,074,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
1,434,477,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
162,415,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
1,375,400,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
12,742,000
InterestAndDebtExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
17,835,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
101,215,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AMTD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
8.86
current ratio reported
8.83
deferred revenue growth
-11.24
fcf margin
16.88
owner earnings margin
16.88
revenue growth
25.8
revenue growth per share
25.8
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AMTD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 69.45% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used (no value anywhere for AssetImpairmentCharges, ShareOfLossesOfJointVentures)
revenue is annual, not TTM
no operating income found in XBRL
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left