Every figure this model derived for AMG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AMG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
17.46
current ratio
1.97
current ratio reported
1.97
dilution pct
-8.59
ebit cagr
-17.02
ebit yoy
-13.2
ev ebit
35.33
ev owner earnings
11.95
ev sales
5.32
fcf margin
46.91
growth cv
10.7
interest cover
2.33
net debt ebitda
7.2
operating margin
15.06
owner earnings margin
44.51
revenue growth
11.8
revenue growth per share
22.32
roic
4.91
rule of 40
26.86
sbc pct revenue
2.4
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AMG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2017-12-31, 3103 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions