Every figure this model derived for ALDS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
16,305
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
119,275
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
3,662,448
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-2,011,183
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
694,246
InterestExpense
2025-09-30
ocf
-845,876
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
2,380,335
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
3,022,082
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ALDS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
132.54
current ratio
0.03
current ratio reported
0.03
fcf margin
-35.54
growth cv
1.75
interest cover
-0.29
net debt ebitda
10.48
operating margin
-8.48
owner earnings margin
-162.5
sbc pct revenue
126.96
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ALDS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-13 (109 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: revenue growth