Every figure this model derived for AJG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AJG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
21.47
current ratio
1.07
current ratio reported
1.05
deferred revenue growth
25.54
ebit cagr
12.19
ebit yoy
-4.74
ev ebit
40.7
ev owner earnings
33.87
ev sales
5.13
fcf margin
15.54
growth cv
0.38
interest cover
3.06
net debt ebitda
3.68
operating margin
12.59
owner earnings margin
15.13
revenue growth
26.32
revenue growth per share
26.32
roic
4.36
rpo growth
38.95
rule of 40
38.91
sbc pct revenue
0.41
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AJG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2017-06-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability