Every figure this model derived for AISP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
12,365,685
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
16,980,021
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
5,339,968
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-8,623,772
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
0
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-3,506,695
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
18,148,514
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
2,446,247
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AISP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-22.62
current ratio
16.56
current ratio reported
3.18
deferred revenue growth
-6.79
dilution pct
57.38
fcf margin
-19.32
growth cv
4.16
operating margin
-36.1
owner earnings margin
-32.8
revenue growth
32.24
revenue growth per share
-15.98
rule of 40
-3.86
sbc pct revenue
13.48
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AISP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 12M of net cash against a 4M annual burn is 3.5 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth