Every figure this model derived for AHT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AHT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.97
deferred revenue growth
5.53
dilution pct
26.97
ebit cagr
12.86
ebit yoy
-55.09
ev ebit
15.83
ev owner earnings
115.35
ev sales
1.73
fcf margin
1.42
growth cv
1.47
interest cover
0.47
net debt ebitda
7.41
operating margin
10.92
owner earnings margin
1.5
revenue growth
-5.78
revenue growth per share
-25.79
roic
7.35
rule of 40
5.14
sbc pct revenue
-0.08
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AHT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2014-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization - dep_amort
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity