Every figure this model derived for AHII, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2014-09-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherProductiveAssets
2012-09-30
cash
91,579
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2014-09-30
current assets
48,966
AssetsCurrent
2014-12-31
current liabilities
123,271
LiabilitiesCurrent
2014-12-31
equity
-46,346
StockholdersEquity
2014-12-31
interest expense
0
InterestPaid
2014-09-30
ocf
-414,102
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2014-09-30
revenue
132,684
SalesRevenueNet
2014-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AHII on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
34.1
current ratio
0.4
current ratio reported
0.4
fcf margin
-312.1
operating margin
28.36
owner earnings margin
-312.1
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AHII's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2014-12-31 (11y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
operating income last tagged 2012-12-31, 638 days before the revenue period (2014-09-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
only 272 days of filings, not a full year: margins and growth are measured, but return on capital and every enterprise-value multiple are refused rather than annualised
revenue period ends 2014-09-30 (4352 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2012-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left