Every figure this model derived for AGI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AGI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
63.72
current ratio
2.0
current ratio reported
2.0
ebit cagr
192.96
ebit yoy
95.32
ev ebit
13.64
ev owner earnings
64.18
ev sales
8.27
fcf margin
15.93
growth cv
0.66
interest cover
1097.5
operating margin
60.68
owner earnings margin
12.89
revenue growth
34.29
revenue growth per share
34.29
roic
21.43
rule of 40
94.97
sbc pct revenue
3.04
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AGI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenue - CostOfSales
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage