Every figure this model derived for AG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
54.01
current ratio
2.6
current ratio reported
2.6
ebit cagr
68.55
ev ebit
23.9
ev owner earnings
21.3
ev sales
7.55
fcf margin
36.9
growth cv
1.39
interest cover
15.14
operating margin
31.58
owner earnings margin
35.43
revenue growth
124.25
revenue growth per share
124.25
roic
14.96
rule of 40
155.83
sbc pct revenue
1.47
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged since 2017-12-31; rebuilt from Revenue - CostOfSales
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage