Every figure this model derived for AERGP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
163,636
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
4,584,806
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,209,680
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,398,328
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
2,185,421
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
2,058
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-10,234,342
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
461,727
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
5,664,046
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AERGP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-2200.73
current ratio
1.7
current ratio reported
1.58
dilution pct
5.22
fcf margin
-2251.98
growth cv
1.73
interest cover
-7856.45
revenue growth
-80.97
revenue growth per share
-81.92
rule of 40
-3582.73
sbc pct revenue
1226.71
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AERGP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, owner earnings margin, net margin, ebitda margin -- operating margin came out at -3,502% against a scale that tops out near 2,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 461,727 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
revenue is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin trend
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left