Every figure this model derived for AERA, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-05-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AERA on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
74.57
current ratio
0.08
current ratio reported
0.08
dilution pct
109.57
ev ebit
0.42
ev owner earnings
0.54
ev sales
0.14
fcf margin
25.81
growth cv
1.91
interest cover
13.63
net debt ebitda
0.03
operating margin
32.83
owner earnings margin
25.81
revenue growth
102.36
revenue growth per share
-3.44
roic
89.41
rule of 40
135.18
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AERA's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2019-08-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2016-08-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
gross profit not tagged since 2023-05-31; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin recent