Every figure this model derived for AER, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherProductiveAssets
2014-12-31
cash
1,379,180,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
equity
18,323,280,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
1,910,645,000
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
5,393,124,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
8,516,668,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
166,239,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AER on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
80.93
deferred revenue growth
20.61
dilution pct
-9.45
ebit cagr
37.36
ebit yoy
80.62
ev ebit
16.35
ev owner earnings
12.76
ev sales
7.83
fcf margin
63.32
growth cv
0.76
interest cover
2.13
net debt ebitda
6.27
operating margin
47.89
owner earnings margin
61.37
revenue growth
6.5
revenue growth per share
17.62
roic
5.33
rule of 40
54.39
sbc pct revenue
1.95
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AER's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2010-12-31, 5479 days before the revenue period (2025-12-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2014-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity