Every figure this model derived for ADNH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-09-30
cash
468,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-09-30
current assets
1,792,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-09-30
current liabilities
17,810,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-09-30
equity
-17,783,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-09-30
interest expense
115,000
InterestPaidNet
2024-12-31
ocf
-2,585,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-09-30
revenue
3,276,000
Revenues
2024-12-31
sbc
3,783,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ADNH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-367.89
current ratio
0.13
current ratio reported
0.1
deferred revenue growth
237.15
dilution pct
36.51
fcf margin
-78.91
growth cv
1.65
interest cover
-147.71
operating margin
-518.53
owner earnings margin
-194.38
revenue growth
113.28
revenue growth per share
56.24
rpo growth
-100.0
rule of 40
-405.25
sbc pct revenue
115.48
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ADNH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (607 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-11-14 (289 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions