Every figure this model derived for ACON, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
21,528
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
16,285,462
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
16,794,208
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,036,934
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
17,002,720
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
0
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-8,086,706
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
83,769
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
127,922
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ACON on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
16.2
current ratio reported
16.2
dilution pct
56564.87
growth cv
2.97
revenue growth
33.07
revenue growth per share
-99.77
roic
-1069.54
rule of 40
-11559.07
sbc pct revenue
152.71
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ACON's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin, ebitda margin -- operating margin came out at -11,592% against a scale that tops out near 2,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 83,769 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 16M of net cash against a 8M annual burn is 2.0 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left