Every figure this model derived for ACOG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
321,796
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
41,384,287
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
57,926,682
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
6,412,718
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
52,961,749
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
4,894
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-30,853,299
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
15,260,706
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
5,258,395
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ACOG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-155.03
current ratio
9.18
current ratio reported
9.03
dilution pct
144.1
fcf margin
-204.28
interest cover
-5943.91
operating margin
-190.62
owner earnings margin
-238.74
roic
-198.5
sbc pct revenue
34.46
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ACOG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left